From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
cwillu <cwillu@cwillu.com>,
"Chris Murphy" <lists@colorremedies.com>,
"Hugo Mills" <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
"Michael Kjörling" <michael@kjorling.se>
Subject: Re: [RFC] New attempt to a better "btrfs fi df"
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:58:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508D0FC5.1020404@inwind.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201210281133.10571.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
On 2012-10-28 11:33, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 28. Oktober 2012 schrieb Goffredo Baroncelli:
[...]
>> $ sudo ./btrfs fi df /mnt/btrfs1/
>> Path: /mnt/btrfs1
>> Summary:
>> Disk_size: 21.00GB
>> Disk_allocated: 1.83GB
>> Disk_unallocated: 19.17GB
>> Used: 284.00KB
>> Free_(Estimated): 15.76GB (Max: 20.54GB, min: 10.96GB)
>> Data_to_disk_ratio: 75 %
>
> Okay, so that btrfs fi df.
>
> Which is a summary.
>
> I think much more wouldn´t be a summary anymore, so thats okay.
>
>
> And the following
>
>> Allocated_area:
>> Data,Single: Size:8.00MB, Used:0.00
>> /dev/vdb 8.00MB
>>
>> Data,RAID0: Size:921.75MB, Used:256.00KB
>> /dev/vdb 307.25MB
[...]
>
> is detail shown by btrfs filesystem disk-usage?
Yes
>
> While
>
>> Disks:
>> /dev/vdb 3.00GB
>> Data,Single: 8.00MB
>> Data,RAID0: 307.25MB
>> Metadata,Single: 8.00MB
>> Metadata,RAID1: 460.94MB
[...]
>
> will be btrfs device disk-usage?
yes
>
> What was your reasoning for not using options to btrfs filesystem df? That
> df doesn´t show more than "disk free" as well?
My feel is that a switch should change "a bit" a command. In this case
there are very different outputs, for different purposes (how is used a
disk ? where are the chunks ? how many free space I have ? ).
>
> Then there is a little "inconsistency": "df" versus "disk-usage". I would
> use either "disk-free" and "disk-usage" or "df" and "du". While regular
> "du" is not disk-usage but a filesystem directory tree usage command.
>
> I will think about this a bit more.
>
> Thanks,
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-28 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-25 19:21 [RFC] New attempt to a better "btrfs fi df" Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-25 19:40 ` cwillu
2012-10-25 19:59 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-25 20:06 ` cwillu
2012-10-25 20:36 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-25 20:49 ` cwillu
2012-10-25 20:52 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-25 20:03 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-25 20:11 ` cwillu
2012-10-25 20:41 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-26 2:33 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-26 3:36 ` cwillu
2012-10-26 4:03 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-27 15:05 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-27 16:43 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-27 19:55 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-27 22:30 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-27 22:38 ` Hugo Mills
2012-10-27 23:01 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-28 10:58 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-28 8:45 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-28 10:38 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-28 10:59 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-28 11:18 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-28 12:25 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-28 12:48 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-28 13:22 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-27 23:35 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 11:20 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-28 9:01 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-28 10:33 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-28 10:58 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2012-10-28 11:16 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-28 18:27 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 19:06 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-28 19:42 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 20:09 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-28 20:19 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-29 9:04 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-30 4:41 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 19:42 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-29 13:06 ` Randy Barlow
2012-10-29 22:21 ` [RFC][V2] " Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-30 9:42 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-30 18:15 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-30 18:32 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-30 20:13 ` Chris Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=508D0FC5.1020404@inwind.it \
--to=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=cwillu@cwillu.com \
--cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
--cc=michael@kjorling.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.