From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ali Abedi Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:59:33 -0400 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Channel busy cycles In-Reply-To: References: <5086EA9A.6030400@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca> <5086FFE3.4010108@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca> <508996FF.8060003@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca> <508C34D8.9060607@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca> <508C7342.7020906@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca> Message-ID: <508D3A45.8060901@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org We set retry to 1 and I have checked there is no retries at all. I would appreciate if you ask because we need to figure out what's going on. Ali On 10/28/2012 2:25 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 27 October 2012 16:50, Ali Abedi wrote: >> Thanks for the answer. >> In this experiment we got 0% frame loss, so is your reasoning is still >> valid for this case? And why it is almost constant? I thought maybe RX >> is not counted for OFDM signal extension or OFDM preamble? Does that >> make any sense at all? > Did you check for hardware assisted retries or such? > > Also, it's possible RX doesn't take into account the preamble and sig > parts. I'd have to ask the MAC/Baseband teams about the exact > mechanisms. > > Thanks, > > > Adrian