All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Cc: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: add missing header include
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:45:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <508E5053.5090005@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002101cdb572$fcc4d670$f64e8350$%han@samsung.com>

On 10/29/2012 02:16 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Monday, October 29, 2012 6:49 AM Marek Vasut wrote
>>
>> On 10/26/2012 06:30 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
>>> This patch adds missing device.h header to fix build warnings as below:
>>>
>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by
>> default]
>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is
>> probably not what you want
>>> [enabled by default]
>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:27:45: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by
>> default]
>>> In file included from drivers/cpuidle/driver.c:15:0:
>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by
>> default]
>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is
>> probably not what you want
>>> [enabled by default]
>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:27:45: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by
>> default]
>>>
>>> This build warning is introduced by commit efeca1b
>>> "cpuidle / sysfs: change function parameter".
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
>>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>
>> Jingoo, could you copy-pastebin your config file. I don't have this
>> warning and I would like to understand why.
> 
> Hi Daniel Lezcano,
> 
> Could you build the code by using GCC 4.6.x?
> In my opinion, it would be better.
> 
> Also, my config option is as below:
>     make exynos4_defconfig + CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> 

Ok, I got it.

on x86, the header ioport.h is included indirectly by the headers
including headers. In this file there is a forward declaration.
For ARM, this is not the case.

This is why the warning does not appear on x86 but on ARM.

Thanks
  -- Daniel

>> Thanks
>>   -- Daniel
>>
>>>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h |    2 ++
>>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
>>> index a5bbd1c..2120d9e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
>>> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>>>  #ifndef __DRIVER_CPUIDLE_H
>>>  #define __DRIVER_CPUIDLE_H
>>>
>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>>> +
>>>  /* For internal use only */
>>>  extern struct cpuidle_governor *cpuidle_curr_governor;
>>>  extern struct list_head cpuidle_governors;
>>
>>
>> --
>>  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>>
>> Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
>> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
>> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
> 


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-29  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-26  4:30 [PATCH] cpuidle: add missing header include Jingoo Han
2012-10-26 11:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-26 12:45   ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-10-28 21:49 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-10-29  1:16   ` Jingoo Han
2012-10-29  6:27     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-10-29  9:45     ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=508E5053.5090005@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.