All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:15:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <508E9D9D.4090801@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANr=Z=asUVhOT_ns6+NiNqb6YZ-QTr45D+pdX9W6XMB=QjVyPQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/26/2012 01:45 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:05:16PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/24/2012 12:41 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:50:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>>> On 10/24/2012 11:28 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been thinking about one of the problems we need to solve
>>>>>> over in TI AM335x land and that is given that we support a
>>>>>> number of different boards with a single binary (and we have an
>>>>>> i2c eeprom that tells us what board and revision we are on),
>>>>>> the user needs to be able to easily determine what board we are
>>>>>> on so they know what dtb file to load so they can boot.  To
>>>>>> this end I've added CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_RUNTIME_CONFIG to the
>>>>>> README which says when set we have board_name and board_rev set
>>>>>> at run-time.  Then for am335x[1]
>>>>>
>>>>> With CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG set, there's a environment
>>>>> variable named $board that indicates which board U-Boot is
>>>>> running on (and other related variables). The idea is that the
>>>>> user can:
>>>>>
>>>>> fsload ${devtype} ${devnum}:${rootpart} ${fdt_addr_r}  \
>>>>> /boot/${soc}-${board}.dtb
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG sets $board at compile-time,
>>>>> since the config variable was created in the context on a U-Boot
>>>>> that runs on a single board. However, I see no reason why we
>>>>> can't maintain the user-visible results of this config option
>>>>> even in other cases, so that everything is consistent to the
>>>>> user
>>>>
>>>> This works assuming that board maps to the device tree name.  A bit
>>>> more below...
>>>
>>> True. I've made sure of that for Tegra.
>>>
>>>>> To that end, can we make CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_RUNTIME_CONFIG set
>>>>> $board instead of $board_name?
>>>>
>>>> I had talked with Joe about this on IRC briefly and he seemed to
>>>> be against overwriting "board"
>>>
>>> Why is that? Perhaps alternatively, CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG
>>> should set both board and a default value for board_name.
>>
>> Joe?
> 
> It think in the use-case that you are talking about (multiple boards,
> one binary) the board from the build of the binary could still be
> useful to know in addition to the run-time-determined board name and
> rev.  I think it would also be useful to have the "target" available
> in the env for the same reason.  Tom and I also discussed this on IRC.

OK, so in that case I guess CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG should set both
board and board_name, so that both variables always exist for use by
scripts, so scripts don't have to contain endless conditionals. For the
multiple-boards-one-binary case, board_name can always be overridden at
run-time. If everyone agrees, I can send a patch to add that variable to
CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-29 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-24 17:28 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables Tom Rini
2012-10-24 17:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] README: Document CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_RUNTIME_CONFIG Tom Rini
2012-10-24 17:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] am335x_evm: Add CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_RUNTIME_CONFIG support Tom Rini
2012-10-24 19:21   ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-24 20:56     ` Tom Rini
2012-10-24 17:50 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables Stephen Warren
2012-10-24 18:41   ` Tom Rini
2012-10-24 19:05     ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-24 19:32       ` Tom Rini
2012-10-24 22:24         ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-26  7:45         ` Joe Hershberger
2012-10-29 15:15           ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-10-29 18:13             ` Tom Rini
2012-10-30  0:14               ` Joe Hershberger
2012-10-26  2:41       ` Simon Glass
2012-11-04 18:29 ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=508E9D9D.4090801@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.