From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:61051 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934108Ab2J3SOh (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:14:37 -0400 Received: by mail-bk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id jk13so320798bkc.19 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50901937.80002@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:15:19 +0100 From: Goffredo Baroncelli Reply-To: kreijack@inwind.it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGFlbCBLasO2cmxpbmc=?= CC: kreijack@inwind.it, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, cwillu , Martin Steigerwald , Chris Murphy , Hugo Mills Subject: Re: [RFC][V2] New attempt to a better "btrfs fi df" References: <50899151.1070503@inwind.it> <508F015F.5090507@gmail.com> <20121030094253.GA20662@yeono.kjorling.se> In-Reply-To: <20121030094253.GA20662@yeono.kjorling.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2012-10-30 10:42, Michael Kjörling wrote: > On 29 Oct 2012 23:21 +0100, from kreijack@gmail.com (Goffredo Baroncelli): >> Hi all, [...] > One thing, though; what is the difference between "unused" and > "unallocated"? If there is no difference, I feel the same word should > be used throughout. I had to use "Unused" instead of "Unallocated" because the first one is shorter. In the tabular output of the command "btrfs fi disk-usage" I have 10 columns available for every fields. 1 columns is used by the space character, so I have only 9 characters available for the description. "Unused" is 6 chars, "Unallocated" is 11 chars.... The only options is to use "Unalloc." (8 chars)... -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5