From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Mick Subject: Re: production ready? Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:06:28 -0700 Message-ID: <50904154.7080004@inktank.com> References: <508EE540.5060303@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:64811 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934562Ab2J3VGb (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:06:31 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id hz1so440191pad.19 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:06:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gandalf Corvotempesta Cc: =?UTF-8?B?6KKB5Yas?= , Gregory Farnum , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 10/30/2012 07:59 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > 2012/10/30 =E8=A2=81=E5=86=AC : >> Yes, but network (and many other isssues) must be considered. > > Obviously > >> 3 is suggested. > > Any contraindication running mon in the same OSD server? > Generally that's considered OK. ceph-mon doesn't use very much disk or= =20 CPU or network bandwidth. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html