From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG Subject: Re: slow fio random read benchmark, need help Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:54:03 +0100 Message-ID: <509254CB.1080604@profihost.ag> References: <0cc4e4a7-5f71-4579-8265-f97dc5cba341@mailpro> <24E144B8C0207547AD09C467A8259F7557707A07@lisa.maurer-it.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail.profihost.ag ([85.158.179.208]:49946 "EHLO mail.profihost.ag" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757363Ab2KAKyL (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2012 06:54:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gregory Farnum Cc: Dietmar Maurer , Josh Durgin , Alexandre DERUMIER , Marcus Sorensen , Sage Weil , ceph-devel Am 01.11.2012 11:40, schrieb Gregory Farnum: > I'm not sure that latency addition is quite correct. Most use cases > cases do multiple IOs at the same time, and good benchmarks tend to > reflect that. > > I suspect the IO limitations here are a result of QEMU's storage > handling (or possibly our client layer) more than anything else =97 J= osh > can talk about that more than I can, though! > -Greg Same results with rbd kernel driver without QEMU involved. Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html