From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wido den Hollander Subject: Re: UBUNTU kernel version and ceph 0.51 compatibility Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:09:16 +0100 Message-ID: <50979E5C.1020007@widodh.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp01.mail.pcextreme.nl ([109.72.87.137]:56402 "EHLO smtp01.mail.pcextreme.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831Ab2KELKj (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2012 06:10:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: hemant surale Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" On 05-11-12 05:55, hemant surale wrote: > Hi Community, > I want to know that is there any compatibility chart between > UBUNTU kernel version & ceph v 0.51 ? > Or does anyone know best suite kernel version of UBUNTU with ceph v0.51. > Till now I was working with UBUNTU 12.04 kernel 3.2.0 . But want > to know that is it ok if I move to UBUNTU kernel v 3.6.2. + ceph > v0.51. The 3.6 kernel should work just fine with both the Ceph OSD and the CephFS filesystem. On the #cephday I had a Ubuntu 12.04 system running with a backported 3.6 kernel, both btrfs and cephfs worked fine with 3.6 It depends on your use-case, but there is no chart which tells you what works and what doesn't. If you are going to use XFS as a filesystem behind your OSDs you don't need to run a bleeding-edge kernel. Wido > > > Thanks & Regards, > Hemant Surale. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >