From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Friesen Subject: Re: Fwd: Nice processes prevent frequency increases - possible scheduler regression (known good in 2.6.35) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:54:02 -0600 Message-ID: <5097D30A.1030607@genband.com> References: <1351942405.16850.23.camel@maggy.simpson.net> <1351943332.16850.25.camel@maggy.simpson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Michal Zatloukal Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org On 11/03/2012 09:40 AM, Michal Zatloukal wrote: > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: >> On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 04:33 -0700, Mike Galbraith wrote: >>> On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 21:09 +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote: >>> Your nice 19 tasks receiving 'too much' CPU when there are other >>> runnable tasks around sounds like you have SCHED_AUTOGROUP enabled. >> >> (forgot to mention: if that's the case, you can add noautogroup to your >> kernel command line to turn it off if distro turned it on in .config) >> > > Thanks, Ubuntu's kernel is indeed configured with that option enabled, > and passing "noautogroup" at grub restores the previous behaviour. I'm > back to happy days again :) BTW, isn't this the "magic 200-line patch" > I was reading about ~2 years ago? Yes. Chris