From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Mick Subject: Re: Ubuntu 12.04.1 + xfs + syncfs is still not our friend Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:18:42 -0800 Message-ID: <50999AD2.8030507@inktank.com> References: <50993755.8060800@filoo.de> <50993B61.3090500@filoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:50376 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752619Ab2KFXSq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2012 18:18:46 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id rr4so749859pbb.19 for ; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:18:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50993B61.3090500@filoo.de> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Oliver Francke Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Resolution: installing the packages built for precise, rather than squeeze, got versions that use syncfs. On 11/06/2012 08:31 AM, Oliver Francke wrote: > In answer to myself, > > On 11/06/2012 05:14 PM, Oliver Francke wrote: >> Hi *, >> >> anybody out there who's in Ubuntu 12.04.1/ in connection with libc + >> xfs + syncfs? > > ii libc6 2.15-0ubuntu10.3 > > but: > apt-cache show... > . > . > Provides: glibc-2.13-1 > . > . > > playing with numbers, I think. But make clear, why syncfs-call is not in > :-\ > > ... search continues... > >> >> We bit the bullet and reinstalled two new nodes from debian to precise >> in favour of possible performance increase?! >> >> *sigh*, still getting: >> >> 2012-11-06 17:05:51.863921 7f5cc52e3780 0 filestore(/data/osd6-3) >> mount syncfs(2) syscall not support by glibc >> 2012-11-06 17:05:51.863925 7f5cc52e3780 0 filestore(/data/osd6-3) >> mount no syncfs(2), must use sync(2). >> >> as a show-stopper. >> >> That's with 3.2.* and 3.6.6 kernel. Should be new enough. And >> ceph-0.48.2 ( eu.ceph.com mirror was installing 0.48.1.. though *ops* >> ;) ) >> >> But both should be capable of this system-call?! >> >> We've been so very near... but now clueless, please sched some light >> in 8-) >> >> ( I hope this is not a very obvious human RTFM error ;) ) >> >> And so I'm writing, should one enable directio + aio, as we're having >> the journals on a SSD-partition? >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Oliver. >> > >