From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benoit Cousson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] OMAPDSS: enable DSS for Panda & SDP with devtree Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:58:42 +0100 Message-ID: <509A3EE2.1080500@ti.com> References: <1352121259-5836-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> <20121107010405.GU6801@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:52852 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754624Ab2KGK6y (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 05:58:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121107010405.GU6801@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Tomi Valkeinen , archit@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, s-guiriec@ti.com On 11/07/2012 02:04 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tomi Valkeinen [121105 05:16]: >> Hi, >> >> OMAPDSS device tree support is still some way in the future. Tony has requested >> to get DSS working for Panda & SDP boards with DT kernel, so that we'll have >> fully working boards with DT. >> >> This series makes a few hacks to get a working display on OMAP4 Panda and SDP >> boards. The idea is to setup the omapdss with the non-DT method, creating the >> omapdss devices and passing platform data to them. This setup code is called >> from board-generic for Panda and SDP boards. >> >> There was one problem with this approach: omapdss cannot get regulators using >> the omapdss's names fro the regulators. Thus there's a hack patch to get the >> regulators using the OMAP4 "native" regulator names, thus circumventing the >> problem. >> >> Tony, if these look good, how do you want to merge these? There are three parts >> here, and I think they can be merged independently if so wished: >> >> * .dts changes for the pinmuxing (2 patches) > > Let's let Benoit queue these. Done. I'll send you the pull-request tomorrow in case some more DTS patches are coming. Regards, Benoit From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b-cousson@ti.com (Benoit Cousson) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:58:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/6] OMAPDSS: enable DSS for Panda & SDP with devtree In-Reply-To: <20121107010405.GU6801@atomide.com> References: <1352121259-5836-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> <20121107010405.GU6801@atomide.com> Message-ID: <509A3EE2.1080500@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/07/2012 02:04 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tomi Valkeinen [121105 05:16]: >> Hi, >> >> OMAPDSS device tree support is still some way in the future. Tony has requested >> to get DSS working for Panda & SDP boards with DT kernel, so that we'll have >> fully working boards with DT. >> >> This series makes a few hacks to get a working display on OMAP4 Panda and SDP >> boards. The idea is to setup the omapdss with the non-DT method, creating the >> omapdss devices and passing platform data to them. This setup code is called >> from board-generic for Panda and SDP boards. >> >> There was one problem with this approach: omapdss cannot get regulators using >> the omapdss's names fro the regulators. Thus there's a hack patch to get the >> regulators using the OMAP4 "native" regulator names, thus circumventing the >> problem. >> >> Tony, if these look good, how do you want to merge these? There are three parts >> here, and I think they can be merged independently if so wished: >> >> * .dts changes for the pinmuxing (2 patches) > > Let's let Benoit queue these. Done. I'll send you the pull-request tomorrow in case some more DTS patches are coming. Regards, Benoit