From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Subject: Re: syncfs slower than without syncfs
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:26:00 +0100
Message-ID: <509A8B98.5000707@profihost.ag>
References: <509A2CE6.1010100@profihost.ag> <509A62A6.5070104@profihost.ag> <509A7860.6020805@inktank.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.profihost.ag ([85.158.179.208]:36586 "EHLO
	mail.profihost.ag" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750832Ab2KGQ0E (ORCPT
	<rfc822;ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:26:04 -0500
In-Reply-To: <509A7860.6020805@inktank.com>
Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org>
To: Mark Nelson <mark.nelson@inktank.com>
Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>

Am 07.11.2012 16:04, schrieb Mark Nelson:
> Whew, glad you found the problem Stefan!  I was starting to wonder what
> was going on. :)  Do you mind filling a bug about the control dependencies?

Sure where should i fill it in?

Stefan