From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Durgin Subject: Re: Ubuntu 12.04.1 + xfs + syncfs is still not our friend Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:03:11 -0800 Message-ID: <509AB06F.7030406@inktank.com> References: <50993755.8060800@filoo.de> <50993B61.3090500@filoo.de> <50999AD2.8030507@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:37694 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753306Ab2KGTDe (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:03:34 -0500 Received: by mail-da0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n41so810981dak.19 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:03:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gandalf Corvotempesta Cc: Dan Mick , Oliver Francke , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 11/07/2012 12:14 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > 2012/11/7 Dan Mick : >> Resolution: installing the packages built for precise, rather than squeeze, >> got versions that use syncfs. > > Which packages, ceph or libc? The ceph packages.