All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao.luis@inktank.com>
To: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: less cores more iops / speed
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <509AF625.8040207@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509ADA6A.9000807@profihost.ag>

On 11/07/2012 10:02 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> Hello again,
> 
> I've noticed something really interesting.
> 
> I get 5000 iops / VM for rand. 4k writes while assigning 4 cores on a
> 2.5 Ghz Xeon.
> 
> When i move this VM to another kvm host with 3.6Ghz i get 8000 iops
> (still 8 cores) when i then LOWER the assigned cores from 8 to 4 i get
> 14.500 iops. If i assign only 2 cores i get 16.000 iops...
> 
> Why does less kvm cores mean more speed?

Totally going on a limb here, but might be related to the cache maybe?
When you have more cores your threads may bounce around the cores and
invalidate cache entries as they go by; will less cores you might end up
with some sort of twisted, forced cpu affinity that allows you to take
advantage of caching.

But I don't know, really. I would be amazed if what I just wrote had an
ounce of truth, and would be completely astonished if that was the cause
for such a sudden increase on iops.

  -Joao

> 
> Greets,
> Stefan
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-08  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-07 22:02 less cores more iops / speed Stefan Priebe
2012-11-08  0:00 ` Joao Eduardo Luis [this message]
2012-11-08  0:16   ` Openstack - Boot From New Volume Quenten Grasso
2012-11-08  0:59   ` less cores more iops / speed Mark Nelson
2012-11-08  8:45     ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-11-08  8:58       ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2012-11-08  9:02         ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-11-08  9:05           ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2012-11-08  9:28             ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-11-08 13:19       ` Mark Nelson
2012-11-08 15:14         ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-11-08 15:53           ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2012-11-08 21:52             ` Andrey Korolyov
2012-11-09  8:43             ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-11-08  0:59   ` Mark Nelson
2012-11-08  5:42 ` Dietmar Maurer
2012-11-08  5:49   ` Dietmar Maurer
2012-11-08  6:20     ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-11-08  5:49   ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-11-08  5:54     ` Dietmar Maurer
2012-11-08  6:21       ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-12 15:33 [pve-devel] " Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
     [not found] ` <50A116DC.2020509-2Lf/h1ldwEHR5kwTpVNS9A@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-12 15:39   ` Alexandre DERUMIER

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=509AF625.8040207@inktank.com \
    --to=joao.luis@inktank.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.