From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Subject: Re: syncfs slower than without syncfs
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:09:17 -0800
Message-ID: <509B225D.2060609@inktank.com>
References: <509A2CE6.1010100@profihost.ag> <509A62A6.5070104@profihost.ag> <509A7860.6020805@inktank.com> <509A8B98.5000707@profihost.ag>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:48778 "EHLO
	mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751137Ab2KHDJj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:09:39 -0500
Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id rr4so1689388pbb.19
        for <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:09:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <509A8B98.5000707@profihost.ag>
Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: Mark Nelson <mark.nelson@inktank.com>, ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>

On 11/07/2012 08:26 AM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> Am 07.11.2012 16:04, schrieb Mark Nelson:
>> Whew, glad you found the problem Stefan!  I was starting to wonder what
>> was going on. :)  Do you mind filling a bug about the control
>> dependencies?
>
> Sure where should i fill it in?

http://www.tracker.newdream.net/projects/ceph/issues/new