From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG Subject: Re: syncfs slower than without syncfs Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:52:40 +0100 Message-ID: <509B72D8.3060306@profihost.ag> References: <509A2CE6.1010100@profihost.ag> <509A62A6.5070104@profihost.ag> <509A7860.6020805@inktank.com> <509A8B98.5000707@profihost.ag> <509B225D.2060609@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.profihost.ag ([85.158.179.208]:42953 "EHLO mail.profihost.ag" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750717Ab2KHIws (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2012 03:52:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <509B225D.2060609@inktank.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Josh Durgin Cc: Mark Nelson , ceph-devel done: http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/3461 Am 08.11.2012 04:09, schrieb Josh Durgin: > On 11/07/2012 08:26 AM, Stefan Priebe wrote: >> Am 07.11.2012 16:04, schrieb Mark Nelson: >>> Whew, glad you found the problem Stefan! I was starting to wonder what >>> was going on. :) Do you mind filling a bug about the control >>> dependencies? >> >> Sure where should i fill it in? > > http://www.tracker.newdream.net/projects/ceph/issues/new >