diff for duplicates of <509C23DF.1020106@meduna.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 044e4dd..ec2ad39 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ up should be the same as rounding down. But: is the round_jiffies* safe at all for sub-second precision at jiffies around 0xffffffff? From quick looking it does a modulo, -0xffffffff % say 250 is 45, the next jiffy is at 0... +0xffffffff % say 250 is 45, the next jiffy is@0... Regards -- diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 4332973..27f007e 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -9,14 +9,10 @@ "ref\020121106202038.GB32398@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk\0" "ref\050998F94.8000908@meduna.org\0" "ref\020121106224624.GR28327@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk\0" - "From\0Stanislav Meduna <stano@meduna.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: scheduler clock for MXS\0" + "From\0stano@meduna.org (Stanislav Meduna)\0" + "Subject\0scheduler clock for MXS\0" "Date\0Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:27:59 +0100\0" - "To\0Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>" - " Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>\0" - "Cc\0Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>" - linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org> - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 06.11.2012 23:46, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:\n" @@ -56,10 +52,10 @@ "\n" "But: is the round_jiffies* safe at all for sub-second precision\n" "at jiffies around 0xffffffff? From quick looking it does a modulo,\n" - "0xffffffff % say 250 is 45, the next jiffy is at 0...\n" + "0xffffffff % say 250 is 45, the next jiffy is@0...\n" "\n" "Regards\n" "-- \n" Stano -2f30d967767d16e723ec28885db799b58fafc3456f189310a3f6641c4e3a6da2 +a06f1b58baac39a73852108a8baa72c904db8471885e11b43691a1bdbfc25436
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.