From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Nelson Subject: Ceph Performance Part 2 Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:22:37 -0600 Message-ID: <509D039D.7040200@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:51968 "EHLO mail-ie0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751880Ab2KINWb (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:22:31 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k13so5836336iea.19 for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 05:22:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Hi Guys, The second instalment of our investigation into Ceph performance is live! This time we are looking at write performance on the same set of controllers as in the first article, but using 8 spinning disks and putting both the data and SSDs on those drives. Hope you enjoy! http://t.co/exwXJOVV Mark