From: Stephan Hoffmann <sho@relinux.de>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] libtool version update 2.4.2
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:46:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A0A952.5090001@relinux.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121111230546.709735e3@skate>
Am 11.11.2012 23:05, schrieb Thomas Petazzoni:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 23:00:56 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>> On 11/10/12 10:53, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>>> Alexander,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 16:38:52 +0400, Alexander Khryukin wrote:
>>>
>>>> -LIBTOOL_VERSION = 2.2.10
>>>> +LIBTOOL_VERSION = 2.4.2
>>> How much testing did you give to this version bump? A libtool
>>> version bump is a very sensitive operation, as host-libtool is used
>>> to autoreconfigure many packages in Buildroot. Therefore, this
>>> patch needs a good amount of testing before being committed
>>> (ideally testing that all packages having<foo>_AUTORECONF = YES
>>> still build).
>> Can't we rely on the autobuilders to do that?
> Sure, we'll certainly rely on the autobuilders for a complete testing.
Hello,
did you ever think about inventing a kind of "testing" branch with a
seperate autobuilder running on? That could keep major build problems
away from the master branch.
Just my 2 cents
Stephan
> But I wanted to know if it had been tested again 2 packages or 20-40
> packages, which makes quite a bit of difference :)
>
>> That said, I wouldn't do this for 2012.11 anymore...
> For sure, it should not be part of 2012.11, we already have enough
> issues to fix.
>
> Thomas
--
reLinux - Stephan Hoffmann
Am Schmidtgrund 124 50765 K?ln
Tel. +49.221.95595-19 Fax: -64
www.reLinux.de sho at reLinux.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-12 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-09 12:38 [Buildroot] [PATCH] libtool version update 2.4.2 Alexander Khryukin
2012-11-10 9:53 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-11-10 16:31 ` Alexander Khryukin
2012-11-11 22:00 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-11-11 22:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-11-12 7:46 ` Stephan Hoffmann [this message]
2012-11-12 10:18 ` Alexander Khryukin
2012-11-12 10:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-11-12 20:57 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A0A952.5090001@relinux.de \
--to=sho@relinux.de \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.