Re: [PATCH] alpha: use BUG_ON where possible

[Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>]

On 11/12/2012 09:43 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, Sasha Levin wrote:
> 
>>>> Just use BUG_ON() instead of constructions such as:
>>>>
>>>> 	if (...)
>>>> 		BUG()
>>>>
>>>> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation
>>>> is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>>>>
>>>> // <smpl>
>>>> @@
>>>> expression e;
>>>> @@
>>>> - if (e) BUG();
>>>> + BUG_ON(e);
>>>
>>> Ok, I guess I am just going to apply this one. Thanks,
>>>
>>
>> So I have about 80 more of these. I've sent out the first 10 to make sure
>> that they look fine and the only complaints I got about them are that they are
>> trivial :)
>>
>> Can I send the rest directly to you to go through the trivial tree?
> 
> How many conflict can you see if you generate this patch on top of Linus' 
> tree and thn apply it to linux-next?
> 

One context conflict.


Thanks,
Sasha