From: Chris Ferron <chris.e.ferron at linux.intel.com>
To: powertop@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [Powertop] [RFC] [PATCH 11/11] Ignore non-P-state-enabled CPUs when calculating frequency.
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:32:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A3C78B.2010602@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1427547.3NqOqQh5qg@intelfx-laptop
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2468 bytes --]
On 11/14/2012 06:30 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> On 13 November 2012 11:14:52 Chris Ferron wrote:
>> On 11/05/2012 03:12 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
>>> This fixes bogus reported CPU frequencies (actually, uninitialized
>>> values from i965_core) when i965 monitoring is used.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx100(a)gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> src/cpu/abstract_cpu.cpp | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/cpu/abstract_cpu.cpp b/src/cpu/abstract_cpu.cpp
>>> index d64cb24..fea377b 100644
>>> --- a/src/cpu/abstract_cpu.cpp
>>> +++ b/src/cpu/abstract_cpu.cpp
>>> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ void abstract_cpu::calculate_freq(uint64_t time)
>>>
>>> /* calculate the maximum frequency of all children */
>>> for (i = 0; i < children.size(); i++)
>>>
>>> - if (children[i]) {
>>> + if (children[i] && children[i]->has_pstates()) {
>>>
>>> uint64_t f = 0;
>>> if (!children[i]->idle) {
>>>
>>> f = children[i]->current_frequency;
>> This patch for the bug fix has been merged.
> Ugh, I forgot to notify - to make it work without previous patches,
> one shall rather modify {cpu,nhm}_package::calculate_freq(),
> so merging this patch alone and as-is doesn't do anything...
>
> Please, consider this one for the release:
>
> ---
> diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_package.cpp b/src/cpu/cpu_package.cpp
> index 2e2e8a3..4675167 100644
> --- a/src/cpu/cpu_package.cpp
> +++ b/src/cpu/cpu_package.cpp
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ void cpu_package::calculate_freq(uint64_t time)
>
> /* calculate the maximum frequency of all children */
> for (i = 0; i < children.size(); i++)
> - if (children[i]) {
> + if (children[i] && children[i]->has_pstates()) {
> uint64_t f = 0;
> if (!children[i]->idle) {
> f = children[i]->current_frequency;
> diff --git a/src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp b/src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp
> index 24465a0..a4ed86d 100644
> --- a/src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp
> +++ b/src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp
> @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ void nhm_package::calculate_freq(uint64_t time)
>
> /* calculate the maximum frequency of all children */
> for (i = 0; i < children.size(); i++)
> - if (children[i]) {
> + if (children[i] && children[i]->has_pstates()) {
> uint64_t f = 0;
> if (!children[i]->idle) {
> f = children[i]->current_frequency;
> ---
Yep, I already caught that. Thanks for the follow up.
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-14 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-14 16:32 Chris Ferron [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-14 14:30 [Powertop] [RFC] [PATCH 11/11] Ignore non-P-state-enabled CPUs when calculating frequency Ivan Shapovalov
2012-11-13 19:23 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-13 19:14 Chris Ferron
2012-11-05 11:12 Ivan Shapovalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A3C78B.2010602@linux.intel.com \
--to=powertop@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.