From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfsprogs: Introduce a new subcommand agstate to xfs_fio
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:33:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A71386.80100@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121117020231.GP14281@dastard>
On 11/17/2012 10:02 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:51:04PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> Introduce a new xfs_io command: agstate.
>>
>> This command is used to get/set state for a given allocation group.
>
> xfs_io is not the place for this command.
I was also wonder why we place the agflags command on there since xfs_io is aimed
at examining the regular file I/O paths, but I can not found out a better place
while implementing it.
>
> A couple of weeks ago I started writing an xfs_spaceman module and
> an ioctl interface for exactly this purpose, I just hadn't got
> around to completing it and the kernel patch to test it so I hadn't
> posted it. Once the userspace release is out of the way, I'll post
> the patches to get xfs_spaceman into xfs_progs, and we can use that
> for this AG control from the start.
>
> The reason for this is that the AG state in future is going to be a
> lot more complex than just enabling/disabling allocation, and the
> ioctl interface I prototyped supports a lot of that future
> functionality.
Definitely, so that we can have fine-granted AG controls, that's why I didn't
chose to re-base/post the previous agflags patch but proposed the agstate command
because the naming would sounds more reasonable.
>
> The patch is below so you can see what sort of AG control/state
> functionality I think we'll be needing sooner rather than later, and
> the interface I think we should be using...
Ok, I'll waiting for this feature. :)
BTW, Does it sounds make sense if we implement parent pointer support at first?
http://www.xfs.org/index.php/Unfinished_work#Parent_Pointers.2FCreate.2BEA
I propose this because it would reduce many efforts for implementing xfs_shrinkfs
command, and reduce the overhead for iterating overall file systems to find out
files which are located at offline AGs.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> include/xfs_ag.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> include/xfs_fs.h | 2 ++
>> io/Makefile | 2 +-
>> io/init.c | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> FWIW, I think you forgot to include the file that introduces the
> command in the patch :)
Oops! sorry for the mistake.
Thanks,
-Jeff
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-17 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-16 6:51 [PATCH 1/2] xfsprogs: Introduce a new subcommand agstate to xfs_fio Jeff Liu
2012-11-17 2:02 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-17 4:33 ` Jeff Liu [this message]
2012-11-17 22:59 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A71386.80100@oracle.com \
--to=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.