From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZcpr-0005ZD-Bq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 02:29:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZcpo-0000Es-9b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 02:29:03 -0500 Received: from v220110690675601.yourvserver.net ([78.47.199.172]:58586) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZcpo-0000EW-3C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 02:29:00 -0500 Message-ID: <50A73CB8.5060709@weilnetz.de> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 08:28:56 +0100 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20121116224832.0CE2841A2E@buildbot.b1-systems.de> In-Reply-To: <20121116224832.0CE2841A2E@buildbot.b1-systems.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] buildbot failure in qemu on default_mingw32 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, gollub@b1-systems.de, agraf@suse.de, lcapitulino@redhat.com Am 16.11.2012 23:48, schrieb qemu@buildbot.b1-systems.de: > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder default_mingw32 while building qemu. > Full details are available at: > http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu/builders/default_mingw32/builds/438 > > Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu/ > > Buildslave for this Build: kraxel_rhel61 > > Build Reason: The Nightly scheduler named 'nightly_default' triggered this build > Build Source Stamp: [branch master] HEAD > Blamelist: > > BUILD FAILED: failed compile > > sincerely, > -The Buildbot > Anthony, is this code needed for MinGW? backends/rng-random.c: In function 'rng_random_opened': backends/rng-random.c:77: error: 'O_NONBLOCK' undeclared (first use in this function) backends/rng-random.c:77: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once backends/rng-random.c:77: error: for each function it appears in.) Regards Stefan W.