From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45531) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaMfw-0006oZ-2S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 03:25:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaMfs-0006wX-Va for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 03:25:51 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29909) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaMfs-0006wD-M4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 03:25:48 -0500 Message-ID: <50A9ED04.1020402@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:25:40 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50A7AB3C.4070902@dlhnet.de> In-Reply-To: <50A7AB3C.4070902@dlhnet.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iscsi: do not assume device is zero initialized List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Lieven Cc: Kevin Wolf , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , ronnie sahlberg Il 17/11/2012 16:20, Peter Lieven ha scritto: > Without any complex checks we can't assume that an > iscsi target is initialized to zero. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven > --- > block/iscsi.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/block/iscsi.c b/block/iscsi.c > index eb586cb..d685f20 100644 > --- a/block/iscsi.c > +++ b/block/iscsi.c > @@ -991,6 +991,11 @@ out: > return ret; > } > > +static int iscsi_has_zero_init(BlockDriverState *bs) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > static QEMUOptionParameter iscsi_create_options[] = { > { > .name = BLOCK_OPT_SIZE, > @@ -1017,6 +1022,7 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_iscsi = { > .bdrv_aio_flush = iscsi_aio_flush, > > .bdrv_aio_discard = iscsi_aio_discard, > + .bdrv_has_zero_init = iscsi_has_zero_init, > > #ifdef __linux__ > .bdrv_ioctl = iscsi_ioctl, > Applied to scsi-next branch. Paolo