From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregory.clement@free-electrons.com (Gregory CLEMENT) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:39:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V3 4/5] arm: mm: Added support for PJ4B cpu and init routines In-Reply-To: <20121119091912.GC3290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1352931637-3405-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <1352931637-3405-5-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <50A41BD3.9040509@free-electrons.com> <50A6B427.9080807@free-electrons.com> <20121119031210.GD22106@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20121119091912.GC3290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <50AA2867.7020202@free-electrons.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/19/2012 10:19 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:12:10PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:46:15PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>> On 11/14/2012 11:31 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>>> Hello Russell, >>>> >>>> With the 2 changes I have done on according your comments >>>> do you think you can give your acked-by for this patch? >>>> >>> >>> Hello Russell, >>> >>> I didn't have any feedback from you for this version. >>> If you are fine with this, could you give your Acked-by? >>> >>> >> >> Gregory, >> >> >From the looks of things, Russell has his head wrapped around buggy >> sound driver code for the CuBox. Perhaps Will Deacon or Catalin Marinas >> would care to weigh in? I'm reluctant to take the series without an >> Acked-By from at least one of them. > > Well, I would like to say - it should go through my tree, as it's generic > ARM changes, and as very little (even generic stuff) seems to come through > my tree anymore. But that's going to make the remainder of your patches > difficult to merge. > When I asked if it was possible to Arnd and Olof to take this patch in their tree with your Acked-by, you didn't raise any objection. At this moment it would have been possible to rework the patch set. But now I am afraid that we are out of time to do it in a proper way. Now if you really want to get this patch through your patch system instead of giving a acked-by, well then I will do my best, of course, to fulfil your requirements. But in this case I would have appreciate to be notified earlier. Thanks, Gregory From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory CLEMENT Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/5] arm: mm: Added support for PJ4B cpu and init routines Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:39:03 +0100 Message-ID: <50AA2867.7020202@free-electrons.com> References: <1352931637-3405-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <1352931637-3405-5-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <50A41BD3.9040509@free-electrons.com> <50A6B427.9080807@free-electrons.com> <20121119031210.GD22106@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20121119091912.GC3290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121119091912.GC3290-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Lior Amsalem , Andrew Lunn , Ike Pan , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Nadav Haklai , Ian Molton , David Marlin , Yehuda Yitschak , Jani Monoses , Mike Turquette , Tawfik Bayouk , Dan Frazier , Eran Ben-Avi , Leif Lindholm , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Jason Cooper , Jon Masters , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , Ben Dooks , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Thomas Petazzoni List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 11/19/2012 10:19 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:12:10PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:46:15PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>> On 11/14/2012 11:31 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>>> Hello Russell, >>>> >>>> With the 2 changes I have done on according your comments >>>> do you think you can give your acked-by for this patch? >>>> >>> >>> Hello Russell, >>> >>> I didn't have any feedback from you for this version. >>> If you are fine with this, could you give your Acked-by? >>> >>> >> >> Gregory, >> >> >From the looks of things, Russell has his head wrapped around buggy >> sound driver code for the CuBox. Perhaps Will Deacon or Catalin Marinas >> would care to weigh in? I'm reluctant to take the series without an >> Acked-By from at least one of them. > > Well, I would like to say - it should go through my tree, as it's generic > ARM changes, and as very little (even generic stuff) seems to come through > my tree anymore. But that's going to make the remainder of your patches > difficult to merge. > When I asked if it was possible to Arnd and Olof to take this patch in their tree with your Acked-by, you didn't raise any objection. At this moment it would have been possible to rework the patch set. But now I am afraid that we are out of time to do it in a proper way. Now if you really want to get this patch through your patch system instead of giving a acked-by, well then I will do my best, of course, to fulfil your requirements. But in this case I would have appreciate to be notified earlier. Thanks, Gregory