From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaS9P-0003Oh-R6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:16:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaS9M-0005Gs-Oe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:16:39 -0500 Received: from mail.profihost.ag ([85.158.179.208]:54893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaS9M-0005Ge-EL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:16:36 -0500 Message-ID: <50AA3F42.7060002@profihost.ag> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:16:34 +0100 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <589082222.7272963.1352241778123.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <50A95A6A.4010109@profihost.ag> <50A9E991.2070609@redhat.com> <50A9FD86.3050400@profihost.ag> <50AA01C0.8030709@redhat.com> <50AA0314.6090208@profihost.ag> <50AA04A7.4080200@redhat.com> <50AA065F.5010602@profihost.ag> <50AA089B.7010400@redhat.com> <50AA0A2E.2090506@profihost.ag> <50AA0B90.6060702@redhat.com> <50AA1085.6000106@profihost.ag> <50AA151A.7030008@redhat.com> <50AA1CE7.7090100@profihost.ag> <50AA24E7.7010009@redhat.com> <50AA2DB0.6010107@profihost.ag> <50AA2EDF.6070409@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <50AA2EDF.6070409@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] scsi-hd with discard_granularity and unmap results in Aborted Commands List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: josh.durgin@inktank.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, sage@newdream.net Hi Paolo, Hi Josh, i started to port the iscsi fixes to rbd. The one think i'm missing is. How to tell / call rbd to cancel I/O on the server side? I grepped librbd source code for abort / cancel but didn't find anything. Qemu must be able to tell rbd to cancel a specific I/O request. Greets, Stefan Am 19.11.2012 14:06, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > Il 19/11/2012 14:01, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG ha scritto: >>> The right behavior is to return >>> only after the target says whether the cancellation was done or not. >>> For libiscsi, it was implemented by the commits you mention. >> >> So the whole bunch of changes is needed for rbd? > > Something like the first three: > > 1bd075f29ea6d11853475c7c42734595720c3ac6 > cfb3f5064af2d2e29c976e292c9472dfe9d61e31 > 27cbd828c617944c0f9603763fdf4fa87e7ad923 > > Paolo >