From: chunrongguo <b40290@freescale.com>
To: <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: B29882@freescale.com, B19537@freescale.com,
Joe MacDonald <Joe.MacDonald@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [meta-networking v5 ] inetutils : Update to 1.9.1
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:53:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AB1AE1.80803@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121119133040.GB5534@windriver.com>
Hello,
1. the following patches were accepted by inetutils 1.9.1 upstream
inetutils-1.8-0002-argp-fix-program_invocation_name-detection.patch
inetutils-1.8-1001-ftp-rename-ruserpass-to-avoid-C-library-collision.patch
inetutils-1.8-1002-rshd-detect-__rcmd_errstr-support-in-the-C-lib.patch
inetutils-1.8-1003-use-daemon-from-the-C-library-when-possible.patch
inetutils-1.8-1004-detect-fork-support.patch
inetutils-1.8-1005-ftpd-add-daemon-D-nommu-support.patch
2. the following patches were pending
inetutils-1.8-0001-printf-parse-pull-in-features.h-for-__GLIBC__.patch
inetutils-1.8-0003-wchar.patch
fix-disable-ipv6.patch
I will submit new patch for inetutils 1.9.1
thank you
chunrong
On 2012?11?19? 21:30, Joe MacDonald wrote:
> [Re: [oe] [meta-networking v5 ] inetutils : Update to 1.9.1] On 12.11.19 (Mon 08:34) Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Chunrong Guo <b40290@freescale.com> wrote:
>>
>>> * There are difference spaces between inetutils-1.8/COPYING
>>> and inetutils-1.9.1/COPYING,so md5sum is changed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chunrong Guo <b40290@freescale.com>
>>>
>> I did not built or tested it but the commit log might be improved to
>> express what happened to the patches you removed. I assume they were fixed
>> upstream but it is not clear looking at the changes or commit log.
>>
>> Please make it explicit.
> I agree. I only got do to a proper build test yesterday, and all seemed
> well, but I'd like to see the log expanded a bit as well.
>
> Almost there! And thanks for the update to the new version, that's
> something I'd been thinking I was going to need to get to soon, so it's
> saving me some time.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-20 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-16 2:00 [meta-networking v5 ] inetutils : Update to 1.9.1 Chunrong Guo
2012-11-19 7:35 ` chunrongguo
2012-11-19 10:34 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-11-19 13:30 ` Joe MacDonald
2012-11-20 5:53 ` chunrongguo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50AB1AE1.80803@freescale.com \
--to=b40290@freescale.com \
--cc=B19537@freescale.com \
--cc=B29882@freescale.com \
--cc=Joe.MacDonald@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.