From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Durgin Subject: Re: librbd discard bug problems -> i REALLY got it Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:09:34 -0800 Message-ID: <50ABB94E.2010003@inktank.com> References: <50AAA25F.9040908@profihost.ag> <50AAB4D6.3030304@inktank.com> <50AABDD1.5050802@profihost.ag> <50AAC1B1.9070701@inktank.com> <50AAC3CB.9090309@profihost.ag> <50AAC51C.1090904@inktank.com> <50AAC835.908@profihost.ag> <50AACE9D.8080905@inktank.com> <50AB7BA3.1060906@profihost.ag> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:33185 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753688Ab2KTRJk (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:09:40 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id bh2so1396144pad.19 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:09:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50AB7BA3.1060906@profihost.ag> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" On 11/20/2012 04:46 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > Hi Josh, > > the problem was again in the qemu rbd driver. > > It was using int for several return values instead of int_64. I send 2nd > patch to the qemu list and ceph devel. > > Could you please care that BOTH patches the one from yesterday AND today > get into qemu? Great! I'll look at these later today. > Greets, > Stefan > Am 20.11.2012 01:28, schrieb Josh Durgin: >> On 11/19/2012 04:00 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote: >>> Hi Josh, >>> >>> i don't get it. Every debug line i print is a prositive fine value. BUt >>> rbd_aio_bh_cb get's called with these values. As you can see that are >>> not much values i copied all values < 0 from log for discarding a whole >>> 30GB device. >> >> Could you post the patch of the debug prints you added and the log?