From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from starfish.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.166]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TbAJ6-0007iD-Cm for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:25:43 +0100 Received: (qmail 1905 invoked by uid 1003); 21 Nov 2012 13:11:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.105?) (philip@opensdr.com@96.240.166.19) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 21 Nov 2012 13:11:31 -0000 Message-ID: <50ACD301.9000109@balister.org> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:11:29 -0500 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121016 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: Cc: Koen Kooi Subject: Re: yocto 1.3 branch for meta-openembedded layers, RFC wanted. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:25:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/25/2012 06:55 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > We need a branch to track oe-core 'danny' and I am swamped till ELC-E > happens, so I would like to hold off on patches that make meta-oe layers > incompatible with oe-core 'danny'. > > As for branch maintenance: any volunteers for managing the meta-openembedded > 'danny' branches? There doesn't need to be a single maintainer, but it would > be nice to have one person coordinating everything, even if it's just > pulling in danny-next branches from the layer maintainers every week or so. > > As I said above, I'm swamped for the next 3 weeks, so can people who have > used or are using the 'denzil' branch weigh in with feedback/anecdotes/etc? > I have such a document for oe-core 'denzil', which I keep failing to send > out, but it boils down to "better predictability for merge windows". Please > share your experience for meta-oe here. What is happening on this front? Since oe-core dropp qt-4.8.1, builds including meta-oe are now broken. If the branch maintainers are not ready to go, we need to apply patches that fix builds, even if thy break compatibility with Danny. Philip > > regards, > > Koen > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > > iD8DBQFQiRqzMkyGM64RGpERAschAJ98yscNYLI9qNGRviDm+drBquLttACgoa0X > /YhGdFr+iYLy8n99sXb4zKE= > =ahtL > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > >