From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] memory: tegra30: Fix warning w/o PM_SLEEP Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:45:44 -0700 Message-ID: <50ADCA18.4080004@nvidia.com> References: <1353501740-25420-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <20121121.144727.1842286617829159643.hdoyu@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121121.144727.1842286617829159643.hdoyu@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hiroshi Doyu Cc: "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "axel.lin@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 11/21/2012 05:47 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > From 2257f87f95c3982aac7c30389357db66f597c083 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Hiroshi Doyu > Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:28:39 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] memory: tegra30: Fix warning w/o PM_SLEEP > > Fix build warning w/o PM_SLEEP. Hiroshi, I'm getting 2 copies of all these patches; a normal-looking patch followed by what looks like an mbox file in the message body, or something like that. Also, the patches are all "to" a mailing list, and "cc" various people, whereas they should usually be "to" the people you expect to apply the patch, and "cc" any other people and mailing lists. I'm off work on holidays right now, returning on the 26th and will look into which of these patches I should/shouldn't be taking myself when I get back.