From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: blkfront failure on migrate
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:57:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AE214D.2080304@citrix.com> (raw)
Hello,
A friend of mine was having weird ocasional crashes on migration, and I
took a look at the problem
The VM is a very stripped down ubuntu 12.04 environment (3.2.0 kernel)
with a total of 96MB of RAM, but this appears to be a generic driver
problem still present in upstream.
The symptoms were that on about 5% of migrations, one or more block
devices would fail to come back on resume.
The relevant snippets of dmesg are:
[6673983.756117] xenwatch: page allocation failure: order:5, mode:0x4430
[6673983.756123] Pid: 12, comm: xenwatch Not tainted 3.2.0-29-virtual
#46-Ubuntu
...
[6673983.756155] [<c01fdaac>] __get_free_pages+0x1c/0x30
[6673983.756161] [<c0232dd7>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x27/0xa0
[6673983.756165] [<c04998b1>] blkif_recover+0x71/0x550
[6673983.756168] [<c0499de5>] blkfront_resume+0x55/0x60
[6673983.756172] [<c044502a>] xenbus_dev_resume+0x4a/0x100
[6673983.756176] [<c048a2ad>] pm_op+0x17d/0x1a0
...
[6673983.756737] xenbus: resume vbd-51712 failed: -12
[6673983.756743] pm_op(): xenbus_dev_resume+0x0/0x100 returns -12
[6673983.756759] PM: Device vbd-51712 failed to restore: error -12
[6673983.867532] PM: restore of devices complete after 182.808 msecs
Looking at the code in blkif_recover
(http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.6.7/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c#L1054)
In "Stage 1" as commented, we make a copy of the shadow map. We then
reset the contents of the real shadow map, and selectively copy the
in-use entries back from the copy to the real map.
Looking at the code, it appears possible to do this rearranging inplace
in the real shadow map, without requiring any memory allocation.
Is this a sensible suggestion or have I overlooked something? This
order-5 allocation is a disaster lying in wait for VMs with high memory
pressure.
--
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-22 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-22 12:57 Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-11-22 13:46 ` blkfront failure on migrate Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 15:07 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:18 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50AE214D.2080304@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.