From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:31:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AE5348.502@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50AE5D1102000078000AAA69@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 22/11/12 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 22.11.12 at 17:05, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 22/11/12 15:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 22.11.12 at 16:37, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> A quick solution would be to execute a noop function with
>>>> run_in_exception_handler(). Alternatively, I can code enable_nmi() or
>>>> so which does an inline iret to itself. Which of these would you prefer?
>>> I would actually consider avoiding to run softirqs altogether in that
>>> case, just like native Linux doesn't do any event or scheduler
>>> processing in that case.
>> That would probably be the easiest solution.
>>
>> I was already going to do the same for the rentrant NMI and MCE handling
>> case (and also the process pending upcalls checking), due to the
>> complexities of fixing the race condition at the end of the handler.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I don't think I have time to look at this issue
>> immediately, but if it is ok to wait till the beginning of next week, I
> That's fine of course.
>
>> can roll it into the main dev work for the other NMI/MCE work.
> Hmm, that would mean it's going to be more difficult to backport.
> I'd prefer having this in as simple a fashion as possible in the
> patch here, and then have your other patch(es) build on top of
> that.
>
> Jan
>
I will ensure that the fix for this is suitably separate in the patch
series, and in the easiest backportable form.
--
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-22 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-22 15:00 [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:15 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 15:16 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:21 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 15:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:55 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 16:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 16:12 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 16:31 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-02-28 9:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 12:32 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 13:00 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 13:12 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 13:39 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:25 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 14:42 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 14:49 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 15:01 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 15:41 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 15:52 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 15:55 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 16:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 16:01 ` Keir Fraser
2013-02-28 16:17 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 19:02 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-01 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: defer processing events on the NMI exit path Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 10:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 11:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-01 11:53 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 15:56 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-01 16:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-01 16:08 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: don't rely on __softirq_pending to be the first field in irq_cpustat_t Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: defer processing events on the NMI exit path Keir Fraser
2013-02-28 13:42 ` [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:04 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 14:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-11-22 15:22 ` Mats Petersson
2012-11-22 16:00 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 17:34 ` Tim Deegan
2012-11-26 11:50 ` George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50AE5348.502@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.