Re: extended attributes wiredness

[David Arendt <admin@prnet.org>]

Hi,

There is no dmesg output.

Thanks in advance,
David Arendt

On 11/24/12 04:39, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:09:16PM +0100, David Arendt wrote:
>> Well, this is only code to demonstrate the problem, the ; is normally a
>> silly mistake, but for my test case valuelen is < 0 so, the ; doesn't
>> change anything. With this corrected, the problem stays the same.
>>
>> On 11/23/12 21:43, Garry T. Williams wrote:
>>> On Friday, November 23, 2012 18:45:04 David Arendt wrote:
>>>>   for (i = 0; i < attrslen; i+= strlen(&attrs[i]) + 1)
>>>>   {
>>>>     printf("processing attribute %s\n", &attrs[i]);
>>>>
>>>>     valuelen = lgetxattr(argv[1], &attrs[i], value, 1024);
>>>>
>>>>     if (valuelen < 0);
>>>   Hmmm ----------------^
> Hi David,
>
> Any dmesg output for this?
>
> thanks,
> liubo
>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html