From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752811Ab2KYAHA (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:07:00 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:43583 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752696Ab2KYAG7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:06:59 -0500 Message-ID: <50B160FD.6050004@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:06:21 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yinghai Lu CC: "Eric W. Biederman" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Landley , Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/12] x86, boot: add fields to support load bzImage and ramdisk high References: <1353482170-10160-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1353482170-10160-12-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <50AD0CA1.8000904@zytor.com> <50AD291A.10600@zytor.com> <50AE70E7.6060204@zytor.com> <87haofi3d3.fsf@xmission.com> <50B104BC.90208@zytor.com> <50B124E9.400@zytor.com> <87vccud0i5.fsf@xmission.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/24/2012 04:04 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Eric W. Biederman > wrote: >> >> I believe all added variables between the last version of the boot >> protocol /sbin/kexec knows about and the current time were added in the >> initialized data section. Certainly we can check and that will tell us >> how likely changes in arch/x86/boot/ have been regressions in the 32bit >> entry point support. >> >> As for solving this there is a simple solution. Add a second jump >> right after the first jump. The variables after the second jump can >> all be zero initialized. > > could use .org to force start_of_setup start from 0x1000 > > but how about area before setup_header ? how it is full of EFI_STUB suff there. > Yes, it doesn't really solve the problem I fear. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.