All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Passing arguments to the linker when external toolchain is used.
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:44:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B28348.7090701@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMJ=MEfp0Bevk141N4n8KAn2AzbRpEDfLX9513crSDLTxBKkwA@mail.gmail.com>

On 25/11/12 18:23, Ronny Meeus wrote:
>>> >>  In my application we need to create partially linked objects that will
>>> >>  be linked together in a final link step.
>>> >>  I see that the correct options (ABI etc) are passed to the compiler
>>> >>  via the ext-toolchain-wrapper construction, but for the linker this
>>> >>  technique is not used. It is directly invoked without modifying the
>>> >>  command line. If I want to create this partially linked file, I need
>>> >>  to pass an extra option the linker to indicate that is needs to use
>>> >>  the N32 abi (-melf32btsmipn32).
>> >
>> >
>> >    First of all, I don't understand why ld needs any option that we normally
>> >  pass to the compiler.  Do the -march, -mtune and -mfpu options even work
>> >  in ld?
> I think you miss-understood my mail.
> The linker needs a different option (-melf32btsmipn32) while the
> compiler needs -march, -mtune and -mfpu etc.
> For the compiler there is no issue, it is the linker for which no
> options are passed.

  In that case, why not just pass them with LDFLAGS?


> If you look to the changes I made to the wrapper, you can see that a
> completely different set of options can be passed to the linker. The
> compiler options are passed to the compiler while a different set of
> options is passed to the linker.

  Sorry, I didn't look at the patch in that much detail...


  Regards,
  Arnout
-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                               arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect                 +32-16-286540
Essensium/Mind                                     http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium                BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-25 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-23 13:04 [Buildroot] Passing arguments to the linker when external toolchain is used Ronny Meeus
2012-11-24 23:33 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-11-25 17:23   ` Ronny Meeus
2012-11-25 20:44     ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2012-11-25 20:56       ` Ronny Meeus
2012-11-25 22:25         ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-11-26 20:45           ` Ronny Meeus
2012-11-26 22:33             ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-11-28 19:38               ` Ronny Meeus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50B28348.7090701@mind.be \
    --to=arnout@mind.be \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.