From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laxman Dewangan Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the regulator tree with the mfd tree Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:17:21 +0530 Message-ID: <50B31079.5060309@nvidia.com> References: <20121126164412.653f0cb43bb55775475f6ed3@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hqemgate03.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.140]:13124 "EHLO hqemgate03.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753945Ab2KZGrY (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 01:47:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121126164412.653f0cb43bb55775475f6ed3@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Samuel Ortiz On Monday 26 November 2012 11:14 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the regulator tree got a conflict in > include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h between commit 3863db3e800c ("mfd: tps65090: > Remove unused member of struct tps65090") from the mfd tree and commit > 24282a1ca33b ("regulator: tps65090: Register all regulators in single > probe call") from the regulator tree. > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). > The merges looks fine.