From: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
To: Alessio Igor Bogani <alessio.bogani@elettra.trieste.it>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Conditionally compile counter_32k
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:09:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B3781E.3040205@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B36B81.4010709@elettra.trieste.it>
On 11/26/12 15:15, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> On 26/11/2012 13:02, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>> On 11/26/12 11:28, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> [...]
>>> # Common support
>>> -obj-y := sram.o dma.o fb.o counter_32k.o
>>> +obj-y := sram.o dma.o fb.o
>>> obj-m :=
>>> obj-n :=
>>> obj- :=
>>>
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER) += counter_32k.o
>>
>> We are moving away from this config option in favor of runtime detection,
>
> Well, I'll be happy when it'll happen.
>
>> Why do you need this?
>
> Because until now the build system doesn't honour the config file. Indeed it builds that source code file also when I set CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER to n.
>
> The runtime detection isn't a good excuse for doesn't make the build system working like users expect.
So, the problem is the users expectations...
If you look, at Tony's omap-for-v3.8/timer branch,
patch: ARM: OMAP2+: timer: remove CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER
it should change the expectations (at least I tried to do this in Kconfig file).
So, to the question of honoring the config option - yes,
but it is a work in progress on removing that one.
If you have a real issue that you are trying to fix - it is totally different thing,
but if it is just config option honoring... then I don't think we should merge this patch.
--
Regards,
Igor.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-26 9:28 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Conditionally compile counter_32k Alessio Igor Bogani
2012-11-26 12:02 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-11-26 13:15 ` Alessio Igor Bogani
2012-11-26 14:09 ` Igor Grinberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B3781E.3040205@compulab.co.il \
--to=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
--cc=alessio.bogani@elettra.trieste.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.