All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fs: configfs: programmatically create config groups
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:06:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B3A1A0.2000607@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xa1ty5hogv6j.fsf@mina86.com>

On 11/26/2012 05:56 PM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> On 11/26/2012 09:35 AM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
>>> In some parts of the kernel (e.g. planned configfs integration into usb
>>> gadget) there is a need to programmatically create config groups
>>> (directories) but it would be preferable to disallow creating them by
>>> the user. This is more or less what default_groups used to be for.
>>> But e.g. in the mass storage gadget, after storing the number of
>>> luns (logical units) into some configfs attribute, the corresponding lun#
>>> directories should be created, their number is not known up front so
>>> default_groups are no good for this.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> $ echo 3>   /cfg/..../mass_storage/luns
>>>
>>> causes
>>>
>>> /cfg/....../mass_storage/lun0
>>> /cfg/....../mass_storage/lun1
>>> /cfg/....../mass_storage/lun2
>
> On Mon, Nov 26 2012, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> I though we did not want the luns file but instead use
>>
>> mkdir /cfg/....../mass_storage/lun0
>> mkdir /cfg/....../mass_storage/lun1
>>
>> directly.
>
> I think that's suboptimal, and we can do better.  There are too many
> corner cases (ie. what if user does “mkdir lun7” without the previous
> luns?), it adds complexity to the kernel (ie. parsing of the name), and
> the thing is overly complicated for user (“echo 5>  nluns” is much nicer
> than having to create 5 directories).

Wouldn't say that. It may adds complexity on another level. The target
subsystem has the same problem with adding luns and there seems nothing
wrong with having lun3 and 4 and leaving 0 and 1 unsued.
With the tcm gadget I get:

|scsi 0:0:0:2: Direct-Access     LIO-ORG  RAMDISK-MCP      4.0  PQ: 0 
ANSI: 5
|scsi 0:0:0:3: Direct-Access     LIO-ORG  FILEIO           4.0  PQ: 0 
ANSI: 5

You notice :2 and :3 instead :0 and :1. While should be there something
wrong with this?

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-26 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-26  8:35 [RFC][PATCH] fs: configfs: programmatically create config groups Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-11-26  8:35 ` [RFC][PATCH] fs: configfs: allow other kernel parts to " Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-11-26 13:14 ` [RFC][PATCH] fs: configfs: " Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-26 16:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-26 16:56   ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-26 17:06     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2012-11-26 17:54       ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-27 15:20         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-28  7:08           ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-11-27  8:57   ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-11-27 14:32     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-27 15:59     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-27 16:23       ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-28  8:15         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-28 13:05           ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-28 13:50             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-28 14:24               ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-11-28 18:52                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-12-07 23:18               ` Joel Becker
2012-12-10 11:57                 ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-12-10 14:17                   ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-12-10 14:34                     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-12-10 15:27                       ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-12-12  1:10                     ` Joel Becker
2012-12-11 21:27                   ` Joel Becker
2012-12-14 12:18                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-28  8:10       ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2012-11-28  8:38         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-11-28 14:09           ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50B3A1A0.2000607@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrzej.p@samsung.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.