From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3573E0034C for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:58:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 3DEEAF811EC; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:58:57 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FREEMAIL_FROM, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DCEF811EC; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:58:56 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <50B3AE06.7020807@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:59:34 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org References: <1353610181-14057-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <96715462.r9LSDhPm2f@rudolf> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH v3 0/8] iMX6 Yocto Support based on 12.09.01 BSP X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:58:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2012-11-26 09:45, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Thomas Senyk > wrote: >> I've just tested a 'bitbake core-image-x11' and it builds without any problem. >> >> I got a couple of warnings such as: >> WARNING: File '/opt/viv_samples/vdk/tutorial2' from gpu-viv-bin-mx6q was >> already stripped, this will prevent future debugging! >> >> ... I don't mind them, but "silencing" them would be helpful/good enough >> (no clue if this is possible/feasible) > > I did a brief check how to quiet them but didn't find a way so I let > them on for now. > >> I would like to tell you that I've also tested this on the hardware, but it my >> imx6 got "stolen" by colleagues ;) > > Please do! :) I've tried these new changes on my imx6qsabrelite board and X now comes up (no more segmentation violation), but the touch screen isn't working. I don't see a module available for it (it used to be tsc2004). How do I get the touch screen going? Thanks