From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] First pass at merging Bart's HA work Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:42:10 +0200 Message-ID: <50B460C2.9020000@mellanox.com> References: <1353957308.2681.5.camel@dabdike> <1353989041.28917.24.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1353989041.28917.24.camel-1q1vX8mYZiGLUyTwlgNVppKKF0rrzTr+@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: David Dillow , James Bottomley Cc: Roland Dreier , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , linux-scsi , Bart Van Assche , fujita.tomonori-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org, rcj-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 27/11/2012 06:04, David Dillow wrote: > We can push it through James's tree if need be, but Bart's code is > pretty self-contained, and going through the SCSI tree will introduce > merge dependencies. It'd be much easier to push it all through the > RDMA tree Yep, this makes sense to me even without taking into account the time left for the merge window to open, the patches have been around for long time and relate directly to the SRP code in the IB subsystem, there's no point in introducing merge dependencies where it can be avoided. Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html