From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: OMAP* Latest build failures Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:43:35 -0600 Message-ID: <50B68587.3050200@ti.com> References: <20121114092643.GG3290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121117093307.GL3332@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121120175733.GH18567@atomide.com> <50AC0B83.9070704@ti.com> <20121128151814.GZ3332@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:33375 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755182Ab2K1Vno (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:43:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121128151814.GZ3332@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Tony Lindgren , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Eduardo Valentin , Radhesh Fadnis On 11/28/2012 09:18 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:00:19PM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 11/20/2012 11:57 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Russell King - ARM Linux [121117 01:35]: >>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:26:43AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>>>> OMAP* allnoconfig fails: >>>>> >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_dss_set_min_bus_tput': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.text+0x1e08): undefined reference to `omap_pm_set_min_bus_tput' >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_hwmod_init_postsetup': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x8f8): undefined reference to `omap_pm_if_early_init' >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_serial_init_port': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1284): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count' >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_timer_init': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1544): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count' >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap2_common_pm_init': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1af0): undefined reference to `omap_pm_if_init' >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap2_gpio_dev_init': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x2168): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count' >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_display_init': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x25cc): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count' >>>> >>>> These are now gone, but we have a new warning: >>>> >>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c:163:28: warning: 'omap_counter_match' defined but not used >>> >>> Jon, care to fix this one? >> >> Fix already available here [1]. I actually included this in my latest >> pull request with some other timer clean-ups [2]. Let me know if you are >> ok with this being part of this pull request or if you want to handle >> this separately. >> >> Cheers >> Jon >> >> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135300866115036&w=2 >> [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135308624321232&w=2 > > Well, it's now two weeks on, and the warning is still there... what's going > on? Why aren't fixes propagating upstream? I saw a pull request from Tony on Monday night [1], however, does not appear to have made its way to ARM SoC yet. So it's on it's way. Cheers Jon [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135397838631792&w=2 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jon-hunter@ti.com (Jon Hunter) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:43:35 -0600 Subject: OMAP* Latest build failures In-Reply-To: <20121128151814.GZ3332@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20121114092643.GG3290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121117093307.GL3332@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121120175733.GH18567@atomide.com> <50AC0B83.9070704@ti.com> <20121128151814.GZ3332@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <50B68587.3050200@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/28/2012 09:18 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:00:19PM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 11/20/2012 11:57 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Russell King - ARM Linux [121117 01:35]: >>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:26:43AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>>>> OMAP* allnoconfig fails: >>>>> >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_dss_set_min_bus_tput': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.text+0x1e08): undefined reference to `omap_pm_set_min_bus_tput' >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_hwmod_init_postsetup': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x8f8): undefined reference to `omap_pm_if_early_init' >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_serial_init_port': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1284): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count' >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_timer_init': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1544): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count' >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap2_common_pm_init': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1af0): undefined reference to `omap_pm_if_init' >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap2_gpio_dev_init': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x2168): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count' >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_display_init': >>>>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x25cc): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count' >>>> >>>> These are now gone, but we have a new warning: >>>> >>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c:163:28: warning: 'omap_counter_match' defined but not used >>> >>> Jon, care to fix this one? >> >> Fix already available here [1]. I actually included this in my latest >> pull request with some other timer clean-ups [2]. Let me know if you are >> ok with this being part of this pull request or if you want to handle >> this separately. >> >> Cheers >> Jon >> >> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135300866115036&w=2 >> [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135308624321232&w=2 > > Well, it's now two weeks on, and the warning is still there... what's going > on? Why aren't fixes propagating upstream? I saw a pull request from Tony on Monday night [1], however, does not appear to have made its way to ARM SoC yet. So it's on it's way. Cheers Jon [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135397838631792&w=2