Re: [PATCH] x86/hap: Fix memory leak of domain->arch.hvm_domain.dirty_vram

[Kouya Shimura <kouya@jp.fujitsu.com>]

On 11/28/2012 05:39 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 28.11.12 at 07:51, Kouya Shimura <kouya@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> This patch fixes the memory leak of domain->arch.hvm_domain.dirty_vram.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kouya Shimura <kouya@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Wouldn't it be more consistent (and less redundant) to do this
> through calling hap_track_dirty_vram(d, 0, 0, ...)? And even if
> not, the conditional around the freeing/clearing is pointless.
>
> Jan
>

 From another point of view, it's consistent since it almost
copied from shadow_teardown()@xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c.
That is a sibling function of hap_teardown().
If it's not preferable, another cleanup patch should be made.

IMHO, I feel no good to remain a pointer to the freed memory
even though it never be dereferenced any more.
So it makes sense to check the pointer and set it NULL.

Thanks,
Kouya