All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
To: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] drm/ttm: call ttm_bo_cleanup_refs with reservation and lru lock held, v3
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:36:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B748D6.5070003@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B72DED.1070705@vmware.com>

By removing the unlocking of lru and retaking it immediately, a race is
removed where the bo is taken off the swap list or the lru list between
the unlock and relock. As such the cleanup_refs code can be simplified,
it will attempt to call ttm_bo_wait non-blockingly, and if it fails
it will drop the locks and perform a blocking wait, or return an error
if no_wait_gpu was set.

The need for looping is also eliminated, since swapout and evict_mem_first
will always follow the destruction path, no new fence is allowed
to be attached. As far as I can see this may already have been the case,
but the unlocking / relocking required a complicated loop to deal with
re-reservation.

Changes since v1:
 - Simplify no_wait_gpu case by folding it in with empty ddestroy.
 - Hold a reservation while calling ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use again.
Changes since v2:
 - Do not remove bo from lru list while waiting

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 202fc20..1beed25 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -488,12 +488,16 @@ static void ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
 	ttm_bo_mem_put(bo, &bo->mem);
 
 	atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0);
+	wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
 
 	/*
-	 * Make processes trying to reserve really pick it up.
+	 * Since the final reference to this bo may not be dropped by
+	 * the current task we have to put a memory barrier here to make
+	 * sure the changes done in this function are always visible.
+	 *
+	 * This function only needs protection against the final kref_put.
 	 */
-	smp_mb__after_atomic_dec();
-	wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
+	smp_mb__before_atomic_dec();
 }
 
 static void ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
@@ -543,68 +547,84 @@ static void ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
 }
 
 /**
- * function ttm_bo_cleanup_refs
+ * function ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock
  * If bo idle, remove from delayed- and lru lists, and unref.
  * If not idle, do nothing.
  *
+ * Must be called with lru_lock and reservation held, this function
+ * will drop both before returning.
+ *
  * @interruptible         Any sleeps should occur interruptibly.
- * @no_wait_reserve       Never wait for reserve. Return -EBUSY instead.
  * @no_wait_gpu           Never wait for gpu. Return -EBUSY instead.
  */
 
-static int ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
-			       bool interruptible,
-			       bool no_wait_reserve,
-			       bool no_wait_gpu)
+static int ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
+					  bool interruptible,
+					  bool no_wait_gpu)
 {
 	struct ttm_bo_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
+	struct ttm_bo_driver *driver = bdev->driver;
 	struct ttm_bo_global *glob = bo->glob;
 	int put_count;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 
-retry:
 	spin_lock(&bdev->fence_lock);
-	ret = ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, interruptible, no_wait_gpu);
-	spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
+	ret = ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false, true);
 
-	if (unlikely(ret != 0))
-		return ret;
+	if (ret && !no_wait_gpu) {
+		void *sync_obj;
 
-retry_reserve:
-	spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
+		/*
+		 * Take a reference to the fence and unreserve,
+		 * at this point the buffer should be dead, so
+		 * no new sync objects can be attached.
+		 */
+		sync_obj = driver->sync_obj_ref(&bo->sync_obj);
+		spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
 
-	if (unlikely(list_empty(&bo->ddestroy))) {
+		atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0);
+		wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
 		spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-		return 0;
-	}
 
-	ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, false, true, false, 0);
-
-	if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY)) {
-		spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-		if (likely(!no_wait_reserve))
-			ret = ttm_bo_wait_unreserved(bo, interruptible);
-		if (unlikely(ret != 0))
+		ret = driver->sync_obj_wait(sync_obj, false, interruptible);
+		driver->sync_obj_unref(&sync_obj);
+		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
-		goto retry_reserve;
-	}
+		/*
+		 * remove sync_obj with ttm_bo_wait, the wait should be
+		 * finished, and no new wait object should have been added.
+		 */
+		spin_lock(&bdev->fence_lock);
+		ret = ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false, true);
+		WARN_ON(ret);
+		spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 
-	BUG_ON(ret != 0);
+		spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
+		ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, false, true, false, 0);
 
-	/**
-	 * We can re-check for sync object without taking
-	 * the bo::lock since setting the sync object requires
-	 * also bo::reserved. A busy object at this point may
-	 * be caused by another thread recently starting an accelerated
-	 * eviction.
-	 */
+		/*
+		 * We raced, and lost, someone else holds the reservation now,
+		 * and is probably busy in ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use.
+		 *
+		 * Even if it's not the case, because we finished waiting any
+		 * delayed destruction would succeed, so just return success
+		 * here.
+		 */
+		if (ret) {
+			spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
+			return 0;
+		}
+	} else
+		spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
 
-	if (unlikely(bo->sync_obj)) {
+	if (ret || unlikely(list_empty(&bo->ddestroy))) {
 		atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0);
 		wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
 		spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-		goto retry;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	put_count = ttm_bo_del_from_lru(bo);
@@ -647,9 +667,13 @@ static int ttm_bo_delayed_delete(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, bool remove_all)
 			kref_get(&nentry->list_kref);
 		}
 
-		spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-		ret = ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(entry, false, !remove_all,
-					  !remove_all);
+		ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(entry, false, !remove_all, false, 0);
+		if (!ret)
+			ret = ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock(entry, false,
+							     !remove_all);
+		else
+			spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
+
 		kref_put(&entry->list_kref, ttm_bo_release_list);
 		entry = nentry;
 
@@ -803,9 +827,13 @@ retry:
 	kref_get(&bo->list_kref);
 
 	if (!list_empty(&bo->ddestroy)) {
-		spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-		ret = ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(bo, interruptible,
-					  no_wait_reserve, no_wait_gpu);
+		ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, interruptible, no_wait_reserve, false, 0);
+		if (!ret)
+			ret = ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock(bo, interruptible,
+							     no_wait_gpu);
+		else
+			spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
+
 		kref_put(&bo->list_kref, ttm_bo_release_list);
 
 		return ret;
@@ -1799,8 +1827,9 @@ static int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_mem_shrink *shrink)
 		kref_get(&bo->list_kref);
 
 		if (!list_empty(&bo->ddestroy)) {
-			spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-			(void) ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(bo, false, false, false);
+			ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, false, false, false, 0);
+			ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock(bo, false, false);
+
 			kref_put(&bo->list_kref, ttm_bo_release_list);
 			spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
 			continue;

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-29 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-28 11:25 [PATCH 1/6] drm/ttm: change fence_lock to inner lock Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-28 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/radeon: allow move_notify to be called without reservation Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-28 11:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/ttm: call ttm_bo_cleanup_refs with reservation and lru lock held Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-28 11:54   ` Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-28 12:15     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-28 13:21       ` Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-28 13:55         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-28 14:23           ` Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-28 14:46             ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-28 15:10               ` Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-28 18:32                 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-28 19:21                   ` Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-28 22:26                     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-29  9:42                       ` Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-29 11:36                         ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2012-11-29 20:43                           ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/ttm: call ttm_bo_cleanup_refs with reservation and lru lock held, v3 Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-28 12:28     ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/ttm: call ttm_bo_cleanup_refs with reservation and lru lock held Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-28 11:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/ttm: cope with reserved buffers on swap list in ttm_bo_swapout, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-28 14:27   ` Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-28 11:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/ttm: cope with reserved buffers on lru list in ttm_mem_evict_first, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-28 11:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/ttm: remove no_wait_reserve, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-28 11:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/ttm: change fence_lock to inner lock Thomas Hellstrom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50B748D6.5070003@canonical.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com \
    --cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.