From: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] rbd: don't leak rbd_req for rbd_req_sync_notify_ack()
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:05:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B8D937.5060600@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B8D8D4.9020703@inktank.com>
When rbd_req_sync_notify_ack() calls rbd_do_request() it supplies
rbd_simple_req_cb() as its callback function. Because the callback
is supplied, an rbd_req structure gets allocated and populated so it
can be used by the callback. However rbd_simple_req_cb() is not
freeing (or even using) the rbd_req structure, so it's getting
leaked.
Since rbd_simple_req_cb() has no need for the rbd_req structure,
just avoid allocating one for this case. Of the three calls to
rbd_do_request(), only the one from rbd_do_op() needs the rbd_req
structure, and that call can be distinguished from the other two
because it supplies a non-null rbd_collection pointer.
So fix this leak by only allocating the rbd_req structure if a
non-null "coll" value is provided to rbd_do_request().
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
---
drivers/block/rbd.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index 78493e7..fca0ebf 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -1182,7 +1182,7 @@ static int rbd_do_request(struct request *rq,
bio_get(osd_req->r_bio);
}
- if (rbd_cb) {
+ if (coll) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
rbd_req = kmalloc(sizeof(*rbd_req), GFP_NOIO);
if (!rbd_req)
@@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ static int rbd_do_request(struct request *rq,
rbd_req->pages = pages;
rbd_req->len = len;
rbd_req->coll = coll;
- rbd_req->coll_index = coll ? coll_index : 0;
+ rbd_req->coll_index = coll_index;
}
osd_req->r_callback = rbd_cb;
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-30 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-30 16:03 [PATCH 0/2] rbd: fix two memory leaks Alex Elder
2012-11-30 16:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] rbd: don't leak rbd_req on synchronous requests Alex Elder
2012-12-03 21:06 ` Josh Durgin
2012-11-30 16:05 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2012-12-03 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] rbd: don't leak rbd_req for rbd_req_sync_notify_ack() Josh Durgin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B8D937.5060600@inktank.com \
--to=elder@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.