From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Nelson Subject: Re: wip-filestore Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:36:32 -0600 Message-ID: <50BCFF40.6040308@inktank.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:35307 "EHLO mail-ie0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751705Ab2LCTgd (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:36:33 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c11so4802104ieb.19 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 11:36:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Samuel Just Cc: Sage Weil , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Are we thinking about including this in 0.56? Mark On 12/03/2012 01:31 PM, Samuel Just wrote: > I rejected it only because I didn't manage to measure a performance > increase. The wip-filestore patches look fine though. > -Sam > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >> While playing with recovery on the plane I saw big latency spikes caused >> by draining the filestore op queue. This patch makes it only wait for >> dequeued ops (current handed to threads) and not anything else. Passed >> the rados suite without problems, and some basic testing on my laptop with >> lots of filestore op threads. >> >> I remember you had a patch doing something similar a while back and >> rejected it... but I forget what the issue was? >> >> sage >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >