From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Clarke Subject: Re: Best practice with 0.48.2 to take a node into maintenance Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:59:55 +1300 Message-ID: <50BD12CB.3030506@catalyst.net.nz> References: <0F892E7E-CF04-49A2-9ABA-5EAF25E6D645@filoo.de> <50BCFA2F.9070603@inktank.com> <50BD0243.2050109@de-punkt.de> <50BD0E16.8090901@catalyst.net.nz> <50BD10A1.5020904@smart-weblications.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bertrand.catalyst.net.nz ([202.78.240.40]:52178 "EHLO mail.catalyst.net.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753035Ab2LCU77 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:59:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <50BD10A1.5020904@smart-weblications.de> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: f.wiessner@smart-weblications.de Cc: Christopher Kunz , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/12/12 09:50, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: > Am 03.12.2012 21:39, schrieb David Clarke: >> On 04/12/12 08:49, Christopher Kunz wrote: >>> Am 03.12.12 20:14, schrieb Josh Durgin: >>>> On 12/03/2012 11:05 AM, Oliver Francke wrote: >> Also, if you're concerned about the time it takes to reboot a machine (sans fsck) then you >> may want to consider using something like kexec (kexec-tools package in Debian/Ubuntu). > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kexec > > > Nice idea, but the website states "Kexec is currently available on the x86 32-bit platform > only." That has to be old information - we're using it in anger on 64 bit x86 machines, from both Intel and AMD. I have no idea about ARM etc, however. - -- David Clarke Systems Architect Catalyst IT -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlC9EsoACgkQRgFDJLQLJc2RUgCeNEV8vLYRq32Kvd8nzQw+sAKk sbgAoIdfyuW53SEer1AVE/97+otdzn5b =xHkx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----