All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan Hoffmann <sho@relinux.de>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] How to handle modularity in buildroot?
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:01:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BDBBD5.8030402@relinux.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201212041249.14541.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz>

Am 04.12.2012 00:49, schrieb Charles Manning:
> On Tuesday 04 December 2012 12:17:13 ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
>
>>> Is there an easy way to have modular/hierarchical projects? For
>>> example I would like to have a base file system that holds common
>>> stuff but then have variants (eg. production vs development).
>>>
>>> In OE this is easy: just create a "basic system" package which is
>>> included in the recipes for each of the variants.
>>>
>>> How would this be tackled in buildroot?
>> I believe what you are looking for is 'make defconfig'.  This will
>> provide a basic set of configuration options to get you going, then
>> you'll have to edit the things like processor family, processor type,
>> whether you want uClibc vs {e,}glibc, etc.
>>
>> The default config is usually okay for a first attempt, however, I like
>> to provide to others in my company a set of config files to choose from.
>> Those, I derive from just cranking through the menuconfig and save the
>> options off when I get done.
>>
>> If you are looking for more than this, there are a few other default
>> config files to attempt.  To list those config files do a 'make help'.
>>
>> Hope this helps!
> Thanks Andy
>
> I am aware of this mechanism but I don't think it really gets me what I am 
> after.
>
> I think that with defconfig, I would be able to make defconfig, then tweak the 
> config to get a variant. But now if I change the base config, I then have to 
> go through the process again for the variant.
>
> What I would like is the ability to have:
> * A base package
> * Production rootfs = base + production files.
> * Development rootfs = base  + development files.
>
Hi Charles,

I think this could be best done with git. You could create a production
and a development branch both based on your common base. After updating
base both branches could either be rebased or the new base merged in.
> Then a change to the base package automatically flows through the production + 
> development rootfs.
>
Well, not really automatically;-) To be honest, I am currently trying to
find an optimal git workflow for this.

Kind regards

Stephan
> Is there a way to accomplish that?
>
> Thanks
>
> Charles
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot


-- 
reLinux     -    Stephan Hoffmann
Am Schmidtgrund 124    50765 K?ln
Tel. +49.221.95595-19    Fax: -64
www.reLinux.de     sho at reLinux.de

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-04  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-03 22:00 [Buildroot] How to handle modularity in buildroot? Charles Manning
2012-12-03 23:17 ` ANDY KENNEDY
2012-12-03 23:49   ` Charles Manning
2012-12-04  9:01     ` Stephan Hoffmann [this message]
2012-12-04  9:10     ` Bjørn Forsman
2012-12-04  9:10     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-12-04 18:18       ` Charles Manning
2012-12-05 17:14         ` Arnout Vandecappelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50BDBBD5.8030402@relinux.de \
    --to=sho@relinux.de \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.