From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIEZyw7ZiZXJn?= Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 01:00:56 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] elfutils and the perf userspace tool In-Reply-To: <50BE7E8E.5000201@petroprogram.com> References: <1354573207.60693.YahooMailNeo@web120305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1354608794.90144.YahooMailNeo@web120304.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <50BE4D1C.3020702@petroprogram.com> <20121204204232.3e5b0ec9@skate> <50BE77CB.2040205@petroprogram.com> <20121204233403.3315e87d@skate> <50BE7E8E.5000201@petroprogram.com> Message-ID: <50BE80A8.1050801@petroprogram.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net 5.12.2012 0:51, Stefan Fr?berg kirjoitti: > 5.12.2012 0:34, Thomas Petazzoni kirjoitti: >> Dear Stefan Fr?berg, >> >> On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:23:07 +0200, Stefan Fr?berg wrote: >> >>>> Don't reinvent the wheel: >>>> >>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-devtools/elfutils/elfutils/uclibc-support.patch >>>> >>>> And possibly other patches in: >>>> >>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-devtools/elfutils/elfutils >>>> >>>> Thomas >>> So why those are not in buildroot yet ? >> Because you forgot to submit a patch? :-) >> >> Thomas > Nah, I have too much work while testing working of latest firefox 16.0.1 > for buildroot right now and trying > to push patches upstream. > > And I let all the honor for that elfutils work to go for Boldan. > > But I did some quick checking of those patches and all those are for > older than 0.155 that Boldan is trying to compile > and that uclibc-support.patch needs some tuning to be applied cleanly > for 0.155 version and there is no mention > of obstack() function problem being fixed (if using uClibc) in any of them. > > Maybe it can be fixed without using gnulib (witch provides obstack > implementation similar to glibc) and using some > standard comforming function(s) but I could not find any. > > Regards > Stefan > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot at busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot And now I just noticed this line from that uclibc-support.patch: |"Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [uclibc specific]" How nice. Like I said earlier. The makers of this elfutils software are really lifting the middle finger in terms of portability. :P I wonder if Ulrich Drepper was (still is?) in head of this ......... | -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: