All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eunchul Kim <chulspro.kim@samsung.com>
To: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Cc: 신중목 <jmock.shin@samsung.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Prathyush K" <prathyush.k@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm/exynos: modify usage of wait for vblank
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:03:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BF3806.1060702@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAQKjZO_krAVLRriskBRDMV0sJPc2384q8-A+5G-sGyTnHoQTA@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Prathyush

Thank's your clarification.

I have one opinion about your [PATCH 1/3]
How about to add atomic_read() condition in each irq_handler ?
like this.

e.g)
+	if (atomic_read(&ctx->wait_vsync_event)) {
+		/* set wait vsync event to zero and wake up queue. */
+		atomic_set(&ctx->wait_vsync_event, 0);
+		DRM_WAKEUP(&ctx->wait_vsync_queue);
+	}

I lost your PATCH mail. so, I send my comment using this body mail.

Thank's
BR

Eunchul Kim.

On 12/05/2012 04:27 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
> 2012/12/5 Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
>
>>
>>
>> 2012/12/5 Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/12/5 Prathyush K <prathyush@chromium.org>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012/12/5 Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012/12/5 Prathyush K <prathyush.k@samsung.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patchset fixes a few issues with use of wait for vblank in
>>>>>>> exynos drm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please apply these three patches without "drm/exynos: release fb
>>>>>>> pended by page flip"
>>>>>>> patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patch 1: modify wait for vsync functions to use wait queues
>>>>>>> This modifies the wait_for_vblank functions to use wait queues
>>>>>>> thus ensuring that the current task goes to sleep without taking
>>>>>>> up CPU while waiting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patch 2: move wait_for_vblank to manager_ops
>>>>>>> Currently, we do not call wait for vblank if encoder is in DPMS_OFF
>>>>>>> state inside exynos_drm_encoder_complete_scanout function. This is
>>>>>>> because wait for vblank is treated as an overlay op.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This can be
>>>>>>> modified to a manager_op thus removing the above check for DPMS_OFF.
>>>>>>> This fixes a crash while removing a fb.
>>>>>>> While removing the current fb (crtc->fb == fb) the encoder
>>>>>>> dpms off is called and then the framebuffer is removed. So in
>>>>>>> this case, the wait for vblank is not called thus leading to a crash
>>>>>>> (since fb might get removed before dma is finished)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patch 3: do not disable crtc if already off
>>>>>>> We should not disable the overlay if the crtc is in DPMS_OFF state.
>>>>>>> Also, the disable function should not call DPMS_OFF of the crtc.
>>>>>>> This is required to ensure we are able to wait for vblank
>>>>>>> before freeing any framebuffers after disabling the crtc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With these three patches and without "drm/exynos: release fb pended
>>>>>>> by page flip"
>>>>>>> I could not find any crash/page_fault in drm with fimd/hdmi during
>>>>>>> hotplug
>>>>>>> and page flips.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems better than old one and also including some exception codes,
>>>>>> Patch 3 we did't consider. Ok, we will test these patches and merge them
>>>>>> instead of old one if no problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested and worked fine. But with this patch and without "drm/exynos:
>>>>> release fb pended by page flip", we would still have potential issue to
>>>>> page fault like below,
>>>>> 1. dma is accessing no current fb
>>>>> 2. the fb to be released is not current fb so the fb would be released
>>>>> without disabling crtc when drm is released.
>>>>> 3. but the memory region to no current fb is being accessed by the dma
>>>>> so the page fault would be induced. This is a rare case but possible issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Mr. Dae,
>>>>
>>>> But we would not release the fb till we get a vblank (i.e. wait for
>>>> vblank is called before removing every framebuffer).
>>>>
>>>> Taking your example itself:
>>>>
>>>> fb0 is current fb i.e. (crtc->fb = fb0).
>>>>
>>>> But the dma is accessing from fb1.
>>>>
>>>> We call remove fb1.
>>>>
>>>> In this case, as you said, crtc will not be disabled as fb1 is not
>>>> current fb.
>>>>
>>>> But we wait for vblank before removing fb1. Thus we ensure that dma from
>>>> fb1 is complete and dma from fb0 has started.
>>>> So it is safe to remove fb1.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please, see the below codes,
>>>
>>> drm_release()
>>>          drm_fb_release()
>>>                  drm_framebuffer_remove()
>>>                          /* assume that current fb is fb1 and dma is
>>> accessing fb0 but trying to release fb0 at here */
>>>                          /* this situation could be reproduced with
>>> pageflip test. */
>>>                          fb0 is not crtc->fb so the crtc isn't disabled
>>>                          ...
>>>                          drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb0);  <- fb0 will be
>>> released without wait_for_vblank().
>>>
>>> The wait_for_vblank() is called by exynos_drm_encoder_complete_scanout()
>>> when fb->func->destroy() is called so the wait_for_vblank() will be called
>>> after fb0 is released.
>>> Is there another place that wait_for_vblank() is called?
>>>
>>>
>> Ah, sorry~. exynos_drm_encoder_completescanout() is called prior to gem
>> releasing. Right, no problem. :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Inki Dae
>>
>>
>
> In addition,
>
> I had added exynos_drm_encoder_complete_scanout() function to resolve this
> issue. but it seems like that previous patch didn't perform wait_for_vblank
> correctly. Anyway this is just exynos specific code. so I hope maybe
> Daniel's fixup can resolve this issue in drm core.
>
> Thanks,
> Inki Dae
>
>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Inki Dae
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hope I correctly understood the issue you mentioned.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Anyway I removed the patch, "drm/exynos: release fb pended by page
>>>>> flip". And I hope this issue can be resolved by Daniel's fixup later.
>>>>>
>>>>> And I think it's better to separate your patch set into 4 patches like
>>>>> below,
>>>>> 1. the patch including only exynos drm framework part.
>>>>> 2. the patch including only fimd driver part.
>>>>> 3. the patch including only hdmi driver part.
>>>>> 4. the patch including exception code.(previous Patch 3)
>>>>>
>>>>> Please, re-send them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure. I'll post them again as requested.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Prathyush
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Inki Dae
>>>>>
>>>>>   Thanks,
>>>>>> Inki Dae
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prathyush K (3)
>>>>>>>    drm/exynos: modify wait for vsync functions to use wait queues
>>>>>>>    drm/exynos: move wait_for_vblank to manager_ops
>>>>>>>    drm/exynos: do not disable crtc if already off
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c    |    6 +++-
>>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h     |   20 ++------------
>>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_encoder.c |   15 +++--------
>>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c    |   37
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_hdmi.c    |   22 ++++++++--------
>>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_hdmi.h    |    2 +-
>>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c       |   37
>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++---------
>>>>>>>   7 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-05 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-04 15:07 [PATCH 0/3] drm/exynos: modify usage of wait for vblank Prathyush K
2012-12-04 16:16 ` Inki Dae
2012-12-05  6:10   ` Inki Dae
2012-12-05  6:40     ` Prathyush K
2012-12-05  7:12       ` Inki Dae
2012-12-05  7:16         ` Inki Dae
2012-12-05  7:27           ` Inki Dae
2012-12-05 12:03             ` Eunchul Kim [this message]
2012-12-05 12:08               ` Prathyush K

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50BF3806.1060702@samsung.com \
    --to=chulspro.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
    --cc=jmock.shin@samsung.com \
    --cc=prathyush.k@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.