From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from li44-10.members.linode.com ([72.14.181.10] helo=plausible.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgUc5-0006dT-LB for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 07:07:18 +0100 Received: from [0.0.0.0] (c-67-171-188-207.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.188.207]) (Authenticated sender: andy-wrs) by plausible.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9BAA2137C; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 21:52:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50C032B1.90501@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:52:49 -0800 From: Andy Ross User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Saul Wold References: <037305f0450c08ec555f5588ad6f3600d2d4a2c8.1354208369.git.elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> <50C02651.30201@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <50C02651.30201@linux.intel.com> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] base/license.bbclass: handle multiple INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSEs X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 06:07:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/05/2012 09:00 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > This patch is still having problems, see the Autobuilder recently build (link below). This is on MUT with the updated binutils, I am not sure if that is part of the problem or not, but binutils was working before. Ah, fun fun. It's not binutils. Something (I'm not sure what -- is "yocto-autobuild" a recipe?) is pulling in the cross-canadian toolchain, and I had missed the appended architecture in the license.bbclass test. I'll get you a fixed and tested patch tomorrow morning. But there's a serious question here: *should* this have worked? The toolchain is GPLv3, and a canadian cross toolchain is presumably intended to be distributed (because by defintion, it doesn't run on the local machine), no? Andy